<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for equivocal ramblings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal</link>
	<description>the occasional journal of kevin francis</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 Beta: Live Messenger 2009 Connection Problems by Adam</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/windows-7-beta-live-messenger-2009-connection-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=146#comment-846</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How do i forward the port?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do i forward the port?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Google Accounts by Kevin Francis</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/05/on-google-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=197#comment-822</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;True, but email isn't the problem. It's logging into say ... YouTube with a @gmail rather than @kevinfrancis.tld address. I already have a Google Apps account @kevinfrancis.tld, I'd like it if it were recognised as such...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but email isn&#8217;t the problem. It&#8217;s logging into say &#8230; YouTube with a @gmail rather than @kevinfrancis.tld address. I already have a Google Apps account @kevinfrancis.tld, I&#8217;d like it if it were recognised as such&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Google Accounts by Thaweesak</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/05/on-google-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Thaweesak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 06:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=197#comment-821</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You can always download or forward your mails from your other accounts to the main one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you set it to download via POP, you can even reply from your main account using the secondary email address.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can always download or forward your mails from your other accounts to the main one.</p>

<p>If you set it to download via POP, you can even reply from your main account using the secondary email address.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Make Your Band&#8217;s Album Cover Meme by devloop :: blog</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/02/make-your-bands-album-cover-meme/comment-page-1/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>devloop :: blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 20:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=166#comment-816</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Le premier album des Florida Oaks...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ne cherchez pas cet album dans les bacs des disquaires... car il n'existe pas.
Dommage, j'aurais bien vu les Florida Oaks comme un chaînon entre Oasis et Rage Against The Machine :D 
L'album tout comme l'artiste sont totalement fictifs.......&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Le premier album des Florida Oaks&#8230;</strong></p>

<p>Ne cherchez pas cet album dans les bacs des disquaires&#8230; car il n&#8217;existe pas.
Dommage, j&#8217;aurais bien vu les Florida Oaks comme un chaînon entre Oasis et Rage Against The Machine :D 
L&#8217;album tout comme l&#8217;artiste sont totalement fictifs&#8230;&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FizzBuzz in PHP by Eric</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2007/04/fizzbuzz-in-php/comment-page-1/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inactiva.org/journal/2007/04/12/fizzbuzz-in-php/#comment-811</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the FizzBuzz tests whether someone remembers that there is a modulus operator (%).  All of the poor solutions I have seen are where people didn't know/forgot that they could use %.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's another solution just for fun:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;for ($i=1,$f='Fizz',$b='Buzz';$i&lt;=100;$i++) echo $i%3+$i%5&lt;1 ? $f.$b : ($i%3&lt;1 ? $f : ($i%5&lt;1 ? $b : $i)), '';&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the FizzBuzz tests whether someone remembers that there is a modulus operator (%).  All of the poor solutions I have seen are where people didn&#8217;t know/forgot that they could use %.</p>

<p>Here&#8217;s another solution just for fun:</p>

<p>for ($i=1,$f=&#8217;Fizz&#8217;,$b=&#8217;Buzz&#8217;;$i&lt;=100;$i++) echo $i%3+$i%5&lt;1 ? $f.$b : ($i%3&lt;1 ? $f : ($i%5&lt;1 ? $b : $i)), &#8221;;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox Scaling Zoom Kills Performance by Kevin Francis</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/03/firefox-scaling-zoom-kills-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=180#comment-787</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I get eye strain pretty easily. I run a laptop with the display set to 120DPI and NoSquint set to 120% because I feel most comfortable at that level (I'd prefer 130% but Windows fonts are ugly at that size).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can't say that I'm surprised that scaling zoom would slow things down as it's forcing Firefox to scale each and every tab (of which I have quite a few open) and I'm running some built-in Intel GMA thing rather than a discreet graphics card. Aero alone seems to strain it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get eye strain pretty easily. I run a laptop with the display set to 120DPI and NoSquint set to 120% because I feel most comfortable at that level (I&#8217;d prefer 130% but Windows fonts are ugly at that size).</p>

<p>I can&#8217;t say that I&#8217;m surprised that scaling zoom would slow things down as it&#8217;s forcing Firefox to scale each and every tab (of which I have quite a few open) and I&#8217;m running some built-in Intel GMA thing rather than a discreet graphics card. Aero alone seems to strain it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox Scaling Zoom Kills Performance by Asa Dotzler</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/03/firefox-scaling-zoom-kills-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Asa Dotzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=180#comment-786</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I zoom a lot of sites (but not all) and don't see any significant performance problems with Firefox 3.0 or Firefox 3.1.  I encourage you to test just manually zooming the most important sites (or using "minimum font size" in preferences) rather than a catch-all plug-in like NoSquint.  I think you'll get better results. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for &lt;em&gt;performant&lt;/em&gt;, the English language is alive and well and adds new words all the time. "Performant" is a useful term and I expect it to become standard before too long. :-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I zoom a lot of sites (but not all) and don&#8217;t see any significant performance problems with Firefox 3.0 or Firefox 3.1.  I encourage you to test just manually zooming the most important sites (or using &#8220;minimum font size&#8221; in preferences) rather than a catch-all plug-in like NoSquint.  I think you&#8217;ll get better results. </p>

<p>As for <em>performant</em>, the English language is alive and well and adds new words all the time. &#8220;Performant&#8221; is a useful term and I expect it to become standard before too long. :-)</p>

<ul>
<li>A</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your Next Favourite Band by Kevin Francis</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/02/your-next-favourite-band/comment-page-1/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=158#comment-777</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comment Phil, will do that and give it another spin. Good catch by the way, finding this far out blog :P&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Phil, will do that and give it another spin. Good catch by the way, finding this far out blog :P</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your Next Favourite Band by Phil</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/02/your-next-favourite-band/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=158#comment-775</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Kevin,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for having a look at yournextfavband.com, sorry it hasn't come up with a band you like. I just wanted to say that it's not the algorithm's fault that it is recommending you something you have heard and don't like. Since we are using Last.fm data, the algorithm only knows what you have listened to from your Last.fm library. If you scrobbled a listen to Jason Mraz, the next time you checked yournextfavband.com you would get a new recommendation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Give it a go and let me know if it works out better!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Phil&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin,</p>

<p>Thanks for having a look at yournextfavband.com, sorry it hasn&#8217;t come up with a band you like. I just wanted to say that it&#8217;s not the algorithm&#8217;s fault that it is recommending you something you have heard and don&#8217;t like. Since we are using Last.fm data, the algorithm only knows what you have listened to from your Last.fm library. If you scrobbled a listen to Jason Mraz, the next time you checked yournextfavband.com you would get a new recommendation.</p>

<p>Give it a go and let me know if it works out better!</p>

<p>Phil</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FizzBuzz in PHP by rune_kg</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2007/04/fizzbuzz-in-php/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>rune_kg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inactiva.org/journal/2007/04/12/fizzbuzz-in-php/#comment-766</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;pretty enough?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;?php
foreach (range(1, 100) as $i) {
   $mod=array($i,"Bizz","Buzz","BizzBuzz");
   echo $mod[(!($i%5))+2*($i%7==0)].' ';
}&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty enough?</p>

<p>&lt;?php
foreach (range(1, 100) as $i) {
   $mod=array($i,&#8221;Bizz&#8221;,&#8221;Buzz&#8221;,&#8221;BizzBuzz&#8221;);
   echo $mod[(!($i%5))+2*($i%7==0)].&#8217; &#8216;;
}</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
