<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>equivocal ramblings &#187; Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/category/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal</link>
	<description>the occasional journal of kevin francis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 14:25:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Instapaper</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2010/05/instapaper/</link>
		<comments>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2010/05/instapaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 14:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instapaper is one of the best web-based tools I&#8217;ve used in a long long while. I love the recommendations &#8212; I just skim the headlines and click Read Later. The Google Reader integration is awesome too. It just integrates so well into my daily routine.

Instapaper, an example of a tool that does one thing, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.instapaper.com/">Instapaper</a> is one of the best web-based tools I&#8217;ve used in a long long while. I love the recommendations &#8212; I just skim the headlines and click <em>Read Later</em>. The <em>Google Reader</em> integration is awesome too. It just integrates so well into my daily routine.</p>

<p>Instapaper, an example of a tool that does one thing, and does it well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2010/05/instapaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox Scaling Zoom Kills Performance</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/03/firefox-scaling-zoom-kills-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/03/firefox-scaling-zoom-kills-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m rather insistent about scaling zoom being set by default 120% of my copy of Firefox. I achieve this with the NoSquint plugin add-on. Of late I&#8217;d been noticing that Firefox page scrolling was really really really bad.

Turns out this is caused by scaling zoom &#8212; turn the default page zoom to 100% and performance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m rather insistent about scaling zoom being set by default 120% of my copy of Firefox. I achieve this with the NoSquint <del datetime="2009-03-01T17:05:35+00:00">plugin</del> add-on. Of late I&#8217;d been noticing that Firefox page scrolling was really really really bad.</p>

<p>Turns out this is caused by scaling zoom &#8212; turn the default page zoom to 100% and performance is really good, with scrolling being smooth and uniform.</p>

<p>Also, I today discovered that I&#8217;ve been right to avoid using the word <em>performant</em> &#8212; <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway/archive/2007/05/10/performant-isn-t-a-word.aspx">performant is not a word</a>! Seems this is quite endemic to the technology industry as I&#8217;ve seen this word being used in everything from white papers to published books&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/03/firefox-scaling-zoom-kills-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safari 4 Scaling Zoom</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/02/safari-4-scaling-zoom/</link>
		<comments>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/02/safari-4-scaling-zoom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lazy Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, Safari has page scaling in the v4 Beta. Sadly though it appears to exhibit strange behaviour with GMail for instance &#8212; When I zoom in, it also scales the width of the entire page, which means I now have to scroll left and right :(

Now, whilst this may or may not be the best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, Safari has page scaling in the v4 Beta. Sadly though it appears to exhibit strange behaviour with GMail for instance &#8212; When I zoom in, it also scales the width of the entire page, which means I now have to scroll left and right :(</p>

<p>Now, whilst this may or may not be the best thing for scaling zoom to do, my question is rather about whether it&#8217;s the <em>right</em> thing to do&#8230;</p>

<p>Page scaling <em>should</em> in theory scale <strong>everything</strong> right? Thoughts anyone? Perhaps you&#8217;re familiar with the W3 recommendation on this matter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/02/safari-4-scaling-zoom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Next Favourite Band</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/02/your-next-favourite-band/</link>
		<comments>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/02/your-next-favourite-band/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your Next Favourite Band is a service that ties into your Last.fm profile and attempts to predict what your next favourite band (duh) might be. I&#8217;ve run it a few times and it keeps saying the same thing: Jason Mraz. I really think they need to overhaul their algorithm because I dislike Jason Mraz.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.yournextfavband.com/">Your Next Favourite Band</a> is a service that ties into your <a href="http://www.last.fm/">Last.fm</a> profile and attempts to predict what your next favourite band (duh) might be. I&#8217;ve run it a few times and it keeps saying the same thing: <a href="http://www.last.fm/music/Jason+Mraz">Jason Mraz</a>. I really think they need to overhaul their algorithm because I dislike Jason Mraz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/02/your-next-favourite-band/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overall Impression of Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/overall-impression-of-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/overall-impression-of-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After using Windows 7 for 2 weeks I think I&#8217;ve got a pretty good feel for it. I haven&#8217;t wavered once in all this time, sticking closely to my goal of using Windows through and through.

It was not an ordeal. It was not painful. It is a definite improvement over XP/Vista. Will I switch to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After using Windows 7 for 2 weeks I think I&#8217;ve got a pretty good feel for it. I haven&#8217;t wavered once in all this time, sticking closely to my goal of using Windows through and through.</p>

<p>It was not an ordeal. It was not painful. It is a definite improvement over XP/Vista. Will I switch to using it full time rather than Linux? <strong>No</strong>.</p>

<p>Windows has improved to the point where it no longer makes me rip my hair out, but it still doesn&#8217;t impress me. It&#8217;s finally what I expected Windows XP to have been, so really, I&#8217;m not impressed. I am however not irritated by it, which <em>is</em> impressive.</p>

<p>P.S.: For all you who are considering it &#8212; nothing has proven incompatible <em>for me</em> except for Daemon Tools which won&#8217;t install at all. Yes it is faster. No, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/overall-impression-of-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Frustration Experienced in Trying to Install Photoshop CS3</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/on-the-frustration-experienced-in-trying-to-install-photoshop-cs3/</link>
		<comments>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/on-the-frustration-experienced-in-trying-to-install-photoshop-cs3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is perhaps the best way I&#8217;ve seen frustration with a software installer expressed in a long while:


  I forsee Friends of Ed creating a book series, &#8220;Foundation Adobe CS3 Installation&#8221;, Amazon cross selling people who buy the software with something like &#8220;Customers who purchased Adobe CS3, also bought 100 capsule bottles of Excedrin, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is perhaps the best way I&#8217;ve seen frustration with a software installer expressed in a long while:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><em>I forsee Friends of Ed creating a book series, &#8220;Foundation Adobe CS3 Installation&#8221;, Amazon cross selling people who buy the software with something like &#8220;Customers who purchased Adobe CS3, also bought 100 capsule bottles of Excedrin, Pepsid AC, and a book titled &#8220;How to find a job when you&#8217;ve been fired for missing a deadline because you were installing Adobe CS3&#8243;.</em>
  <br />
  <br />
  &#8212; Dave Gillem on <a href="http://www.cruciallimit.com/blog/?p=74">Crucial Limit</a></p>
</blockquote>

<p>P.S.: Yes I like long titles :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/on-the-frustration-experienced-in-trying-to-install-photoshop-cs3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 Beta: Performance</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/windows-7-beta-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/windows-7-beta-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brilliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/windows-7-beta-performance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After having used Vista for 2 years since I got my Dell, I&#8217;ve to say that it&#8217;s the slowest, buggiest version of Windows by far, even beating Windows ME for the title. Random lockups, sluggish UI, more random lockups, skipping audio, inability to delete/copy/move files in any reasonable amount of time (&#8220;Calculating remaining time&#8221; anyone?) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After having used Vista for 2 years since I got my Dell, I&#8217;ve to say that it&#8217;s the slowest, buggiest version of Windows by far, even beating Windows ME for the title. Random lockups, sluggish UI, more random lockups, <a href="http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2008/07/audio-playback-suckage-and-vista-service-pack-1/">skipping audio</a>, inability to delete/copy/move files in any reasonable amount of time (&#8220;Calculating remaining time&#8221; anyone?) to name a few of the problems that plagued Vista.</p>

<p>Windows 7 seem to have fixed all that. It just works (so far). None of the earlier problems are prevalent in 7. Speedy UI, effortless file operations, and no more skipping audio.</p>

<p>Let&#8217;s just hope it stays this way. Sad that I keep applying the <em>(so far)</em> qualifier to anything I have to say about Windows 7 &#8212; Microsoft has let me down too many times before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/windows-7-beta-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 Beta</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/windows-7-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/windows-7-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brilliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I installed Windows 7. I guess most of you have watched the videos (and if you haven&#8217;t go do so) by now, and so I&#8217;ll just confirm what we all saw: The new taskbar kinda rocks. The system is fast (really fast), and most of my stuff just works out of the box.

More updates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I installed Windows 7. I guess most of you have watched the videos (and if you haven&#8217;t go do so) by now, and so I&#8217;ll just confirm what we all saw: The new taskbar kinda rocks. The system is fast (really fast), and most of my stuff just works out of the box.</p>

<p>More updates as I actually use it properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2009/01/windows-7-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I ♥ Amarok</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2008/12/i-%e2%99%a5-amarok/</link>
		<comments>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2008/12/i-%e2%99%a5-amarok/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brilliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2008/12/i-%e2%99%a5-amarok/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been using Amarok on my GNOME desktop for years now, and loving it all the way. Recently I switched from Ubuntu to Fedora 10, and there&#8217;s no Amarok 1.4.x package &#8212; just the 2.x.

2.x is still nascent in terms of functionality, and every other Gtk based player I&#8217;ve tried (Banshee, Rhythmbox, Quod Libet, Exaile, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Amarok on my GNOME desktop for years now, and loving it all the way. Recently I switched from Ubuntu to Fedora 10, and there&#8217;s no Amarok <code>1.4.x</code> package &#8212; just the <code>2.x</code>.</p>

<p><code>2.x</code> is still nascent in terms of functionality, and every other Gtk based player I&#8217;ve tried (Banshee, Rhythmbox, Quod Libet, Exaile, BMPx, Listen etc.) don&#8217;t do it for me.</p>

<p>Long live Amarok <code>1.4.x</code>. Whilst not quite what the authors of Amarok dream of &#8212; they want to turn it into a rich media platform, which is a nice idea &#8212; it was (and still is) amazingly good at what it was meant to do. Play and manage music.</p>

<p>P.S.: So good in fact, that I installed the dependencies and compiled the source for <code>1.4.10</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2008/12/i-%e2%99%a5-amarok/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fedora 10</title>
		<link>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2008/12/fedora-10/</link>
		<comments>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2008/12/fedora-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brilliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2008/12/fedora-10/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been running Fedora 10 since the Preview they released a while back and I must say that I&#8217;m incredibly impressed. After switching away from FC 3 to NoNameYet (which became Ubuntu) I&#8217;ve never looked back, being thoroughly impressed with it. Fedora has managed to make me reconsider, flaws and all.

First Impressions

It all starts when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been running <a href="http://www.fedoraproject.org/">Fedora 10</a> since the <em>Preview</em> they released a while back and I must say that I&#8217;m incredibly impressed. After switching away from FC 3 to NoNameYet (which became Ubuntu) I&#8217;ve never looked back, being thoroughly impressed with it. Fedora has managed to make me reconsider, flaws and all.</p>

<h2>First Impressions</h2>

<p>It all starts when you boot the computer, and the extremely impressive start-up screen comes on. Not is it just animated, it&#8217;s of a blue sun with <em>solar flares</em>. I rebooted 2 or 3 times to just look at it. The show is all too soon over though, since Fedora 10 boots quite fast, almost matching Vista.</p>

<h2>Freedom at a (really low) price</h2>

<p>Now, Fedora is of course geared towards Freedom in the somewhat narrower than usual definition of <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html">software freedom</a> &#8212; <em>Free software is a matter of the users&#8217; freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software.</em> Now this comes at a bit of a price for the typical user &#8212; you&#8217;ll have to spend quite a few minutes installing bits and pieces of proprietary, or otherwise un-free software like Nvidia drivers, MP3 playback, Java and so on. This isn&#8217;t particularly difficult thanks to RPMFusion.</p>

<h2>Shiny new stuff</h2>

<p>Fedora certainly does deliver on its promise of an up-to-date, easy to use desktop. The latest GNOME, and all the latest GNOME/Gtk/Mono applications are included in repositories, and are merely a click and some automated downloading away.</p>

<h2>The bad</h2>

<p>One complaint I <em>do</em> have about Fedora though is <code>yum</code> and PackageKit, the package management duo of choice. Compared to <code>apt</code> it is downright sluggish. All the waiting required makes me pre-plan(!) my package management.</p>

<h2>Thoughts</h2>

<p>I find that Fedora makes for an able desktop, wonderful development environment, and presents a good chance to contribute to the free software community. I haven&#8217;t even been trying and I&#8217;ve filed bugs and spent a couple of hours with the SELinux people discussing minor problems in the Preview. For some reason it seems to encourage me to give back <em>shrug</em>.</p>

<p>Maybe it&#8217;ll even convince me to start contributing code again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevinfrancis.net/journal/2008/12/fedora-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
